Oops looks like I forgot to subscribe to this thread and missed a few posts...
Interesting. I just learned of the existance of 9011s a couple days ago while reading up on 9012 HIR2s. Here's the deal, or at least what I can make of it : 9011-9012 is similar to the 9005-9006 combo. 9012 and 9006 are lower wattage (55W), while 9005 and 9011 are higher wattage at 65W. Originally, 9005s were sold for double-bulb systems as the high beam bulb and the 9006 was the low beam bulb. It's not that clear for the 9011 and 9012, in fact I don't really get how they came to life. I do know the 9012 has had an evolution from HIR to HIR2 adn that it is considered to be a high tech high output bulb, and we know it used in halogen projectors like we have on the KLs.
Looking at the link for the 9011, I see only HIR, not HIR2. It is a 65W bulb compared to the 9012 which is 55W. But the 9012, even at 55W, has much more output than a 55W 9006.
And now we have 65W 9005s in 2016 Cherokees instead of 55W 9012s in teh 2014-15s and early 16s.
So... how good would a 65W HIR 9011 be compared to a 55W high performance HIR2 9012 or a 65W 9005 ? We need to find official data on this... yikes...
Thanks. Those are street legal 55W HIR2s with a blue coating. I can only guess here, but they may have less total output than the regular 3000K HIR2s, but... the cooler white may offer better lighting in some conditions, like on wet pavement. Cooler also means more glare for you in the rain or when it snows as the light hits the water droplets or snow flakes.
Do you work for them ? The bulbs you link to are 55W 9012s @
7500K. Now that is blue and output is not good with that color. Way too blue for comfort. And they are also very offending to oncoming drivers. It doesn't say if they are HIR2 or not. If not, then they are even less efficient than the OEM bulbs...
Edit to add : well I guess you really-really like that company after all... :
http://jeepcherokeeclub.com/4-2014-...eep-cherokee-general-discussion/198665-piaa-working-9012-bulbs.html#post2342641